I found a little something from just a couple of years ago where the New York Times covered a topic which is now applicable to Hunter Biden. This is what they wrote:
"There is a Chinese term that means "elegant bribery" in the selling of subjective artwork, a "widespread" practice in China." Hunter has already gotten rich from just one diamond from China which he didn't declare which means he broke several laws in including IRS laws. It's actually a slam dunk investigation but for some reason (tongue in cheek), the DOJ is stalling. Evidence presented itself that they purposefully made sure no one knew about what Hunter did in an effort to help his father win the election. And now he's projected to make millions off his artwork although no one has seen his works before.
If you don't understand this is a quid pro quo then you are naïve and a danger to our society.
"There is a Chinese term that means "elegant bribery" in the selling of subjective artwork, a "widespread" practice in China." Hunter has already gotten rich from just one diamond from China which he didn't declare which means he broke several laws in including IRS laws. It's actually a slam dunk investigation but for some reason (tongue in cheek), the DOJ is stalling. Evidence presented itself that they purposefully made sure no one knew about what Hunter did in an effort to help his father win the election. And now he's projected to make millions off his artwork although no one has seen his works before.
If you don't understand this is a quid pro quo then you are naïve and a danger to our society.
RSS Feed