Knowledge Seeker
  • Home
  • Articles

3D Technology (Two Minutes to Read)

2/1/2016

 
Movies that are expected to be large box office hits often come with a 3D version of the movie especially if it’s an action adventure. I find it kind of funny that young people think 3D technology is new when the 1950’s were considered the 3D decade. I’m sure you can envision pictures you’ve seen of movie audiences in the 50’s wearing those funny looking 3D glasses.

Movie studios back in the 1950’s who were filming 3D movies didn’t have the amazing technology that’s available today. They were restricted to what they could do with the actual film tape whereas today they use digital film and computers to create the 3D effect. Most of the 3D affect back then was due directly to the glasses the audience wore which pulled the screen closer to them as if they were wearing binoculars.

Today movie studios can use technology which allows them to take the same scene and put a couple of layers of the same scene on top of it. So when someone wears 3D glasses it has a rich depth to it where it looks completely natural. It also makes images appear within our grasps which is closer than audiences were able to see it in the 50's.

What most people don’t know is the first 3D movie was the “The Power of Love” and it was produced in 1922. It took close to thirty years to get the idea of 3D movies to take off. Ever since the 50’s the popularity of 3D movies has come and gone. I’m certainly not saying it’s a fad this time but history is what it is.

Just in case you didn’t know the three dimensions (3D), are height, width, and depth. I’m not a huge art fan but the artists who paint are experts at the use of 3D. Think about how amazing it is for them to take a flat canvas and layer dimensions on it to where you and I can tell which objects are closer or further away. So even though artists for thousands of years didn’t call what they did three dimensional they were making it happen never the less. Their goal was to create a painting that looked real so 3D was a necessary aspect of it.

Scientists believe there are many more dimensions beyond the three you and I know. We are born with 3D vision (a.k.a. binocular vision) for our protection. Binocular vision allows us to determine which objects are closer to us. If we didn’t have depth perception we’d fall all over the place and we certainly couldn’t drive.

A good example of the need for depth perception is in playing catch with a baseball. We must be able to see a baseball coming towards us (not just how wide and tall the baseball is) but the depth/distance as well. The speed at which the baseball is travelling is a fourth dimension according to scientist. The baseball travelling towards us is an example of horizontal speed so knowing the rate of something going up or something falling down are also considered dimensions. We might not understand all of these dimensions but they still exist.

Young people like to believe they’re on the cutting edge of everything and that we don’t have a clue. I guess we shouldn’t tell them that 3D has been around since the beginning of time and that mankind has been applying it through art for thousands of years. I guess we shouldn’t tell them the first film made for 3D viewing was in 1922 and that movie theaters were showing a lot of 3D movies in the 1950’s. Then again, maybe we should tell these young whipper snappers! I can use these words now that I’m old enough to be a grandfather.

The Economy of Elections

2/1/2016

 
I often hear people talk about how much money is wasted on election campaigns…many of the presidential candidates raise close to $100 million dollars which is amazing. This generally isn’t done through small donations but instead through huge PACs that certainly have their own agendas.
​
But is the money spent on election campaigns a waste? The thing is the money is spent on things like radio and television advertising, merchandise, printing, consultants, paid staffers, etc. An election campaign is an economy in and of itself. So the fact is one man’s waste is another man’s livelihood.

Equal Pay Act

2/1/2016

 
I’m writing this because of attacks across the country regarding republicans being anti-women including that they don’t want equal pay for women; this tactic disgusts me. I’ll keep this very quick, republicans didn’t support The Equal Pay Act because it wasn’t real legislation. It was an emotional document never meant to be passed because it couldn’t be implemented it was just to be used for political purposes.

Think about this, how in the world could the federal government make sure that everyone is being paid fairly? In my previous company we had four marketing analysts, two men and two women. Is the federal government going to come in and check out each of their salaries? How would they know if someone makes more money because of their unique skill sets in the department? They’re definitely paid differently based on their time with the company.

Speaking of time, how much time would the federal government need to spend with us to figure everything out? Is the federal government going to keep up with pay raises in our department and why we gave those raises? How long would it take to audit all companies across the U.S.? What the democrats are doing is so obvious and so deplorable.

​We know it can’t be done and so do democrats but they don’t care because passing the legislation wasn’t anything they expected; it was just a weapon against republicans that’s all. Keep in mind a woman can already sue her company if she feels she’s being taken advantage of. This is when an investigation can take place but these situations are isolated not something that we need the federal government to create a whole new government agency for. Just how big of an agency would it take to monitor pay across the country? Women can find justice so what’s the Equal Pay Act about besides divisive politics as usual.

Hillary Clinton's Emails

2/1/2016

 
One of Hillary's biggest arguments regarding her email scandal is that she never sent or received anything "marked" classified; so many problems with this. First of all let's say she did receive something marked classified what would've prevented it from reaching her "private" email server? Nothing. It wouldn't have been secured this is why not a single Secretary of State ever used their private email server.
​
The other thing is I had a top secret clearance when I was in the military and went on five top secret missions. Not everything I received in print was marked "classified" it was up to me to understand the content and treat it appropriately. I was qualified to make those decisions. With what Hillary is saying she wasn't qualified as the Head of State to make such decisions. One of the emails they found included the name and location of a CIA agent on the ground in the middle-east. Did she not know this was classified? It would be dangerous if she became the president of the United States.  

    Author: John Mann

    Picture

    Archives

    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly