When The New York Times, writes an article about the Democratic Party's "dark," fundraising, that's got to begin making democrats really nervous. They thought the media would have their backs no matter what, but they began pushing the envelope so far, that not even some of the mainstream media is willing to provide them with cover especially since they've been called out time and time again for fake news.
This is an excerpt from the article:
"A single, cryptically named entity that has served as a clearinghouse of undisclosed cash for the left, the Sixteen Thirty Fund, received mystery donations as large as $50 million and disseminated grants to more than 200 groups, while spending a total of $410 million in 2020 — more than the Democratic National Committee itself."
There's no doubt when it comes to fundraising, that both parties are unethical (both have dark money access), but as usual, democrats take it to all new heights in corruption. But just the fact that we can't get our legislators on both sides of the aisle to pass aggressive campaign finance reforms, tells us all we need to know about whether they put country over politics or vice-versa. Spoiler alert, it's vice-versa.
This is an excerpt from the article:
"A single, cryptically named entity that has served as a clearinghouse of undisclosed cash for the left, the Sixteen Thirty Fund, received mystery donations as large as $50 million and disseminated grants to more than 200 groups, while spending a total of $410 million in 2020 — more than the Democratic National Committee itself."
There's no doubt when it comes to fundraising, that both parties are unethical (both have dark money access), but as usual, democrats take it to all new heights in corruption. But just the fact that we can't get our legislators on both sides of the aisle to pass aggressive campaign finance reforms, tells us all we need to know about whether they put country over politics or vice-versa. Spoiler alert, it's vice-versa.
RSS Feed