Take the latest assassination of Iranian general Qassim Soleimani. They've attacked Trump relentlessly over it. Why in the world should they be upset that a terrorists was killed? The words Democrats are using and their partners in the mainstream media is that General Soleimani didn't pose an "imminent threat," so Trump shouldn't have had him killed. What do they mean by imminent threat? We know he's a threat because we know what he's done. All the terrorists who were killed (remember the deck of cards), from 9/11, weren't according to their terminology, an "imminent threat," they were killed because of what they did and the likely potential to do it again.
Even though it shouldn't, it still shocks me how so many people are sheep. They no longer use common sense and logic. If they did, they'd realize that this whole "imminent threat," propaganda is so outrageous that the perpetrators should forever lose their credibility. But it won't happen, because some people hear only what they want to hear and if it has anything negative to do about Trump, they're all in regardless of the truth. It's both scary and sad.