Democrats are saying they won't support Gina Haspel's appointment to the Director of the CIA because she took part in enhanced interrogation of terrorists after 9/11. Two things: 1) If the roles were reversed and Republicans didn't support her, Democrats would demonize Republicans for being anti-women. As we know Democrats certainly put Party before women as they treat female Republicans horribly. 2) Would they have voted for her if she didn't follow commands and went rogue out in the field? What options did she have? It wasn't her decision to water board; she had to follow orders. So it is a no-win situation with Democrats because they wouldn't have voted for her if she couldn't follow orders. It's all about politics and not about her amazing credentials.
Some Dems are saying that even Senator John McCain doesn't want her appointed but let's face it, he's not of his right mind and had been going down hill over the last three years. He was also tortured in Vietnam so his viewpoint is severely tainted by PTSD when it comes to this topic.
There's no doubt in my mind that she'll get appointed so all Democrats have done is embarrass themselves once again by saying things that are so far out of the mainstream that it is nutty. I hope they keep it up, as the mid-terms could be gleefully historic for Republicans.
Some Dems are saying that even Senator John McCain doesn't want her appointed but let's face it, he's not of his right mind and had been going down hill over the last three years. He was also tortured in Vietnam so his viewpoint is severely tainted by PTSD when it comes to this topic.
There's no doubt in my mind that she'll get appointed so all Democrats have done is embarrass themselves once again by saying things that are so far out of the mainstream that it is nutty. I hope they keep it up, as the mid-terms could be gleefully historic for Republicans.
RSS Feed