The problem is that this expert missed out on an interview Serena just gave and said she has a lot of friends, both male and female and that she wouldn't want to take on any professional male player because she'd get wiped off the court. She said that in a matter of possibly 30 minutes, she would lose the match (6-0, 6-0) because men serve substantially harder and get more aces. Their legwork is faster so it's easier for them to get to a shot whereas it's just the opposite for a female because the ball is moving so much faster because of men's striking speed.
Just for the fun of it, a few years ago, both Williams' sisters took on male opponents that were ranked outside of the Top 200 and they both got destroyed. Isn't it ironic that during the hearing the number one example that was used by one of the experts was already debunked by Serena herself. I would be humiliated if it got it handed to me like this, but it truly doesn't seem to bother democrats as they're a shameless lot. By the way, it was Riley Gaines (Kentucky swimmer) who was also in the hearing, and she called the other witness out for not having her facts straight about Serena.
After watching several hearings on this matter, I'm appalled that it's still going on. Not everything is a no-brainer but this one is. There's data galore that supports separating these two genders from playing sports against one another and from what I can tell, democrats have absolutely nothing that has legitimacy in their arguments. This one should've been dead on arrival.
The picture below is of Riley Gaines who finished second because the male on the left, Leah Thomas, was allowed to compete against the women per the NCAA. Not only did he win, but he also destroyed all other swimmers in the meet. Riley, who dedicated her life to swimming, would've won if it were a fair race.