Last week, AG Garland (the head of all law enforcement in our country), sent a memo to the head of the FBI, directing him to work with local law enforcement “to address threats against school administrators, board members, teachers and staff.” Democrats and their partners the media, say that Garland made the move in response to parents vocally opposing mask mandates and race-related teaching implemented by local school boards; but was this his motive for making the unprecedented move, or should we follow the money?
As I mentioned a few days ago, Biden's son-in-law created a start-up education company (Panorama Education Inc.), and was able to lock in some of the best contracts in the country. I wonder if Jill helped? They signed over 23,000 public schools to receive their various products which all align with social justice issues like critical race theory. They were able to bring in over $76MM in investments including from Mark Zuckerberg. Why were these investors willing to take this risk on a new company? Maybe because it wasn't a risk at all? This is my guess. And then the company turns around and maxes out political contributions to the Biden campaign.
I don't know what will come of it, but now they've found that Zuckerberg funneled over $420MM to Biden's campaign (and some other key politicians running for office), through at least two companies. In case you aren't aware, this is illegal. If you or I did it, we'd already be in jail while they sort out the details. Since in this case it is one of the elitists, he might not be up on charges at all. It's despicable!
As I mentioned a few days ago, Biden's son-in-law created a start-up education company (Panorama Education Inc.), and was able to lock in some of the best contracts in the country. I wonder if Jill helped? They signed over 23,000 public schools to receive their various products which all align with social justice issues like critical race theory. They were able to bring in over $76MM in investments including from Mark Zuckerberg. Why were these investors willing to take this risk on a new company? Maybe because it wasn't a risk at all? This is my guess. And then the company turns around and maxes out political contributions to the Biden campaign.
I don't know what will come of it, but now they've found that Zuckerberg funneled over $420MM to Biden's campaign (and some other key politicians running for office), through at least two companies. In case you aren't aware, this is illegal. If you or I did it, we'd already be in jail while they sort out the details. Since in this case it is one of the elitists, he might not be up on charges at all. It's despicable!
RSS Feed