The New York Times is at it again and got caught downplaying the size of Trump's crowd at his event in Nashville. Their reporter, Julie Davis, took to Twitter and addressed the correction. "President @realDonaldTrump is correct about his crowd last night," Davis tweeted. "My estimate was way off (five times off as she said only a thousand people were there), and we have corrected our story to reflect the fire marshal's estimate of 5,500 people. When we get it wrong, we say so."
How come they ALWAYS conveniently err against President Trump? Why have they never had to recant a positive story about him? Well, mostly because they rarely print anything positive. They even tried to make it look like President Trump's meeting with Kim Jung Un is a terrible thing because it would legitimatize his dictatorship. That's crazy! It's legitimatizing his nuclear weapons program...missiles by the way that would be pointed at the U.S. They seem to conveniently forget that President Clinton tried hard to set up meetings with Kim Jung Un’s father. If it was okay for him to meet with a dictator, then why isn’t it okay for Trump? Just another severe double-standard by the Democrat Party.
The bottom line is the New York Times is printing way too many retractions to any longer be called a "legitimate" news organization.
How come they ALWAYS conveniently err against President Trump? Why have they never had to recant a positive story about him? Well, mostly because they rarely print anything positive. They even tried to make it look like President Trump's meeting with Kim Jung Un is a terrible thing because it would legitimatize his dictatorship. That's crazy! It's legitimatizing his nuclear weapons program...missiles by the way that would be pointed at the U.S. They seem to conveniently forget that President Clinton tried hard to set up meetings with Kim Jung Un’s father. If it was okay for him to meet with a dictator, then why isn’t it okay for Trump? Just another severe double-standard by the Democrat Party.
The bottom line is the New York Times is printing way too many retractions to any longer be called a "legitimate" news organization.
RSS Feed