So the WH Press Secretary, on behalf of the Biden Administration, once again refused to provide the names of art brokers/dealers/individual buyers, involved in purchasing Hunter Biden's paintings. Why?
Here's a little something that I hope shocks you but it goes to show how far ahead some liberals are/were thinking to gain influence, power, and money. Did you know that Dems already got passed in December 2020, legislation which protects government employees from having to report financial gain when it comes to paintings. Let that sink in. Why would they need this? I guess now we now. They were way ahead of us in providing Hunter will protection. There was an attempt to shelter other items as well such as diamonds, but it didn't fly. This would've possibly helped Hunter as he received huge compensation from China in the form of a beautiful diamond which he didn't report. The way this would normally work is that people could get grand-fathered in under the new law. Dems were hoping to provide Hunter with cover through him not having to go through a trial for the gift from the Chinese government. By the way, why do Dems want the freedom to hide money they receive through various donations? Surely if they were doing good, they'd want people to know about it. This tells me they're not.
I'll say this again, do you think the media and democrats in general, would protect someone like Eric Trump if the roles were reversed? No, instead they'd be running vicious news cycles 24/7. They'd demand to no know who's buying his art so we can get to the real question: "Why is someone buying Hunter's art?" This, is a security question.
Here's a little something that I hope shocks you but it goes to show how far ahead some liberals are/were thinking to gain influence, power, and money. Did you know that Dems already got passed in December 2020, legislation which protects government employees from having to report financial gain when it comes to paintings. Let that sink in. Why would they need this? I guess now we now. They were way ahead of us in providing Hunter will protection. There was an attempt to shelter other items as well such as diamonds, but it didn't fly. This would've possibly helped Hunter as he received huge compensation from China in the form of a beautiful diamond which he didn't report. The way this would normally work is that people could get grand-fathered in under the new law. Dems were hoping to provide Hunter with cover through him not having to go through a trial for the gift from the Chinese government. By the way, why do Dems want the freedom to hide money they receive through various donations? Surely if they were doing good, they'd want people to know about it. This tells me they're not.
I'll say this again, do you think the media and democrats in general, would protect someone like Eric Trump if the roles were reversed? No, instead they'd be running vicious news cycles 24/7. They'd demand to no know who's buying his art so we can get to the real question: "Why is someone buying Hunter's art?" This, is a security question.
RSS Feed