Anyhow, this particular judge is an activist and one of the things she's spoken about in the past, is that she believes voter identification is an undue burden on the poorer neighborhoods around the country. She thinks getting I.D.'s is too much to ask for to ensure voter integrity.
This is where it got fun. Marsha asked her a question that she refused to answer, and she told the woman that she demands her response in writing since she wouldn't give it verbally in front of the panel.
What was this question that sent shockwaves among democrats? Marsha said that across the country, and not only in schools predominantly white, that people are required to sign in and provide photo identification for the protection of our children. Marsha wanted to know since this liberal judge considers a picture I.D. an undue burden, should the school systems be forced to stop checking photo identification? She asked if people showed their identification to get into her courthouse where she worked, and is this an undue burden? Should this practice be stopped since it is so hard on people of color. Simple question, with once again, no answer. She just sat there stoically.
What could she say, she got burned in the 1st degree? The faces of democrats in this moment were hilarious as they couldn't wait to get off the subject which they quickly did because that's what they do when the truth starts rearing what democrats refer to as "it's ugly head."
What can I say but...Marsha, Marsha, Marsha. You go girl! 😁