Knowledge Seeker
  • Home
  • Articles

To War or Not to War?

5/1/2017

 

I hate to use the word
propaganda but what a lot of us were taught regarding America’s involvement in WWI does include a good amount of it which I’ll explain in a moment. First of all, President Wilson (D) was mostly a pacifist and wanted to remain neutral when Germany made their move on Brussels, France, and Russia.

He was able to refrain from declaring war on Germany even when the British luxury passenger liner
Lusitania (that had some Americans on board), was sunk by a German U-Boat. But just because we hadn’t declared war doesn’t mean we weren’t engaged in the war.  

Although Wilson said we would remain neutral, Germany and Austria-Hungary didn’t see it that way (nor did German Americans), because we were selling supplies (i.e. ammo, clothing, food, weapons, etc.), to the Allied Forces. Although not shared in most U.S. history textbooks, the main reason Germany sank the
Lusitania was that it was hiding military supplies in the hull of the ship that the passengers didn’t know about. In Germany’s mind we had chosen sides and weren’t neutral like President Woodrow Wilson’s Administration was telling everyone.

The Wall Street Investor J.P. Morgan, Jr. had even established a $500 million line of credit for Britain and France. Keep in mind the U.S. was in a recession then all of a sudden manufacturing took off and the same money we were lending was being spent here in the U.S. and collecting interests; it was truly a win-win for us.

Then there’s the fact that we had every incentive to insure the Allies’ success because that’s the only way we’d get our $500 million back. It was actually the same scenario that France had with us during the Revolutionary War when they backed us with credit and supplies. It was extremely important for them that we win our Revolution.

So it wasn’t the sinking of the
Lusitania with its innocent victims that got us to declare war against Germany or the atrocities they were guilty of that we’d known about for years; instead it was when President Wilson received a cable from Germany that they’d no longer allow us to sell supplies to the Allied forces and that they’d use their U-Boats to sink our merchant ships if we tried to support them.

This was President Wilson’s final straw of no longer being a pacifist and remaining neutral so what truly changed at this point? Germany’s atrocities were already well known. Quite simply, a big part of it was our ability to make money off the war and if Germany won, we wouldn’t get all the money back that we were owed by Britain and France.

The spin of course was that we were a great country who was going to help out our brethren but to be realistic we should admit there was more to our generosity. Our Allies who had long been trying to get us to help knew exactly what our motives were but they certainly didn’t care, they just wanted the help.

My goal was to accomplish four things with this post. First, that the use of
propaganda isn’t something only prone to communists’ or socialists’ countries as it doesn’t matter which of our political parties are in office, they twist the truth to fit their needs. Another way of putting it is they mislead us or some would go as far as saying they lie to us, it just depends upon your moral compass.

Second, that it’s easy for some people to demonize people who profit off the war but the fact is, our economy benefits not
just a bunch of corporate executives. Even today people work for companies who have military contracts with our Federal Government and they’re pumping money into the economy. If you were one of these people keeping your family afloat with your job how would you feel about us being a pacifist’s country?

Third, when trying to find out the motive regarding many things, especially politics, the answer can typically be found sitting alongside the money. President Wilson was a brilliant man so he knew he was misleading people about us truly being neutral. He knew we were benefiting from the war and that we desperately needed the Allies to win.

Lastly, he wanted to stick to his ideology about being passive/neutral but the real world of economics gave him an awakening. The thing is, someone’s ideology means little when people are struggling to put a roof over their heads and/or food on the table. You can be as philosophical as you want but only after you've met the most basic human needs.

I think this is an amazing statement made by President Wilson where it’s easy to see that a
realistic world view was finally sinking in for him: “It would be a hopeless piece of provincialism to suppose that because we think differently from the rest of the world we are at liberty to assume that the rest of the world will permit us to enjoy that thought without disturbance.”

In this particular case of WWI, many people thought it wrong to join the war effort and had huge peace marches taking place in New York City and in Washington, DC. They felt they were taking the moral high ground but were they? If the U.S. would’ve helped the Allied forces sooner, how many millions of lives could’ve been saved?

Millions of brothers, fathers, sons, uncles, etc., died partly because people in the U.S. including President Wilson, believed in pacifism. How many more people would’ve died through German atrocities in WWII if we would’ve stayed on the sidelines? A true pacifist would still say we shouldn’t have helped the Jewish people being brutally murdered but how is this moral?

Sometimes taking the moral high ground means being responsible for authorizing and/or committing violence. For example, if you saw a woman being brutally beaten and raped would you pursue a peaceful solution? Would you jump in and use physical violence to stop the man? Would you run and get help so that someone else would take care of the physical violence so you wouldn’t have to because you’re a pacifist?  

The title of this article is: “To War or not to War, That is the Question.” To help protect citizens the U.S. has to be on the world stage because if our voice isn’t heard and respected it makes us vulnerable to outside influences. Our enemies no longer have to travel on ships to reach us they can be thousands of miles off our coast and have the ability to annihilate major U.S. cities. Avoiding foreign wars would’ve been feasible back in the 1700’s and 1800’s but not any longer.  
​
The fact is we’ve learned over thousands of years that in most cases peace is achieved through strength and sometimes it takes war to bring people to the table to discuss peace. Closing our eyes and hoping for the best to occur around the world so that we aren’t negatively affected is naïve. We certainly shouldn’t enter war lightly but we also shouldn’t not enter it lightly either.

Comments are closed.

    Author: John Mann

    Picture

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly