But, these pundits know it's not a question of widespread voter fraud so they were misleading the audience. Of course it isn't systemic. It was never wide-spread, it was targeted towards swing states. Why in the world would Dems ever need to use widespread voter fraud? Why would they need to switch votes in Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, New York City, etc., when those states are a given? So of course they can try and push the illogical argument that there isn't widespread voter fraud so don't worry about it, but it makes absolutely no sense. Either these political pundits are outrageously ignorant, or they think their constituents (the sheep), are. Maybe both? I guess both.